Small Breasts + Flat Chest

This 20-year-old patient sought aesthetic improvement due to nipple elongation and breast shape changes after breastfeeding. Nipple position asymmetry and differences in the inframammary fold were noticeable, with the left side showing signs of an inverted nipple and the right side displaying elongated nipple.

While inverted nipple correction usually requires surgery, in this case, the implant insertion alone sufficiently improved the inverted nipple, so the focus was on reducing the elongation of the right nipple. The 2-stage Motiva implants were used, with 340 cc for the right side and 320 cc for the left side, maximizing correction of the asymmetry.

After the procedure, the patient reported minimal pain, close to a 0 on the pain scale, and the final result showed a natural, youthful, and well-balanced breast shape. The patient was very satisfied with the outcome.

Nipple Reduction

This 60-year-old patient, who experienced nipple elongation and breast asymmetry due to breastfeeding, came in for improvement. The patient also suffers from scoliosis, which often leads to breast asymmetry. In her case, the left breast had more volume than the right, and the left accessory breast was also larger. Additionally, the left nipple was longer than the right, making the asymmetry more noticeable.

To correct the asymmetry and create a natural shape, we chose different implant types for the two sides, using a 2-stage implant for the left side and a 3-stage implant for the right, with a height difference to balance the breasts. Motiva implants were used: 400 cc for the right side and 340 cc for the left. To address the nipple size discrepancy, approximately 8mm of tissue was removed from the left nipple to make both sides proportionate to the breast size.

The patient experienced rapid recovery and, in the end, achieved a youthful, symmetrical, and firm breast shape despite her age. The patient was very satisfied with the natural and youthful transformation.

Height: 157 cm / Weight: 50 kg / Underbust: 65 cm / Bust: 82 cm / Implant size: Rt 330 cc, Lt 310 cc / Incision length: 3.0 cm

This patient came to our clinic seeking treatment for bottoming-out after undergoing breast augmentation with an armpit incision at a different clinic two years ago. Despite undergoing two corrective surgeries at that clinic, the issue was not resolved, which prompted her to seek our expertise. She wanted to correct the bottoming-out and achieve a more rounded breast shape, as opposed to the previous wide shape. Additionally, she requested that her cleavage not appear too defined.

In response, we replaced her previous 215cc implants with 330cc implants and carefully reclosed the excessively opened pocket from the first surgery. To prevent recurrence, we performed meticulous and precise corrective work to ensure stable results.

This case demonstrates that preventing bottoming-out and avoiding reoperation requires selecting appropriate implants based on the patient’s anatomical structure and performing careful, precise pocket dissection during the initial surgery. Through these measures, we achieved a stable and long-term satisfactory result.

Height: 167 cm / Weight: 60 kg / Underbust: 79.5 cm / Bust: 84 cm / Implant size: 405 cc / Incision length: 3.5 cm

This patient, who had a long breastfeeding period after childbirth, was concerned about her loss of breast volume and sagging. The cleavage was very wide, and her skin had lost firmness, leading to noticeable differences in the inframammary folds.

By filling the volume sufficiently and symmetrically adjusting the inframammary folds, her breasts became full and balanced. The cleavage was brought much closer together, and the areolas that had been sagging were improved to a rounder, firmer appearance.

Height: 155 cm / Weight: 45 kg / Underbust: 64.3 cm / Bust: 74 cm / Implant size: 275 cc / Incision length: 2.8cm

This patient had a 1.5 cm height difference between the left and right inframammary folds. The left breast, with the higher inframammary fold, appeared slightly smaller and tighter, although the overall volume between the breasts was quite similar.

The inframammary folds were symmetrically adjusted, and the implants were positioned as inward as possible. As a result, the cleavage and breast gap were significantly improved. Given her already slim waistline, the placement of the implants helped enhance her curves, accentuating a more feminine silhouette with a smooth and elegant shape.

Height: 156 cm / Weight: 50 kg / Underbust: 67 cm / Bust: 73 cm / Implant size: 295 cc (High profile) / Incision length: 3.1 cm

The patient had a narrow chest with a protruding sternum, giving her a wide gap between the breasts. She also had several asymmetrical elements, including a higher right inframammary fold and a left inverted nipple.

By positioning the implants as far medially as possible, the breast gap was significantly reduced. The inframammary folds were aligned to the same height, and the inverted left nipple was corrected, as the implant gently pushed it outward, restoring a more natural shape.

Height: 158 cm / Weight: 54 kg / Underbust: 78.5 cm / Bust: 84 cm / Implant size: 405 cc / Incision length: 3.6 cm

This patient came in with concerns about reduced volume and sagging after childbirth. Given the wide breast width, the distance between the nipple and inframammary fold was short, giving her breasts a more square shape rather than a round one.

After the augmentation surgery, her breasts appeared to be lifted, with a more round and comfortable shape. The overall appearance was enhanced, providing a more natural and youthful look.